You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2705-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Leclère, Michael Obersteiner, Mike Barrett, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Abhishek Chaudhary, Adriana De Palma, Fabrice A. J. DeClerck, Moreno Di Marco, Jonathan C. Doelman, Martina Dürauer, Robin Freeman, Michael Harfoot, Tomoko Hasegawa, Stefanie Hellweg, Jelle P. Hilbers, Samantha L. L. Hill, Florian Humpenöder, Nancy Jennings, Tamás Krisztin, Georgina M. Mace, Haruka Ohashi, Alexander Popp, Andy Purvis, Aafke M. Schipper, Andrzej Tabeau, Hugo Valin, Hans van Meijl, Willem-Jan van Zeist, Piero Visconti, Rob Alkemade, Rosamunde Almond, Gill Bunting, Neil D. Burgess, Sarah E. Cornell, Fulvio Di Fulvio, Simon Ferrier, Steffen Fritz, Shinichiro Fujimori, Monique Grooten, Thomas Harwood, Petr Havlík, Mario Herrero, Andrew J. Hoskins, Martin Jung, Tom Kram, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Tetsuya Matsui, Carsten Meyer, Deon Nel, Tim Newbold, Guido Schmidt-Traub, Elke Stehfest, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Chris Ware, James E. M. Watson, Wenchao Wu, Lucy Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,397 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 214 | 9% |
| Spain | 179 | 7% |
| United States | 154 | 6% |
| Germany | 58 | 2% |
| Colombia | 57 | 2% |
| Mexico | 51 | 2% |
| Peru | 49 | 2% |
| Canada | 45 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 43 | 2% |
| Other | 534 | 22% |
| Unknown | 1013 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1799 | 75% |
| Scientists | 535 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 43 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1400 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 261 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 189 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 167 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 107 | 8% |
| Other | 63 | 5% |
| Other | 215 | 15% |
| Unknown | 398 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 329 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 300 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 46 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 31 | 2% |
| Other | 154 | 11% |
| Unknown | 501 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2369. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,446
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#355
of 98,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196
of 427,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#28
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.