↓ Skip to main content

Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for Patients with Severe Covid-19

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 32,765)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3367 Mendeley
Title
Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for Patients with Severe Covid-19
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2020
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2007016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Grein, Norio Ohmagari, Daniel Shin, George Diaz, Erika Asperges, Antonella Castagna, Torsten Feldt, Gary Green, Margaret L Green, François-Xavier Lescure, Emanuele Nicastri, Rentaro Oda, Kikuo Yo, Eugenia Quiros-Roldan, Alex Studemeister, John Redinski, Seema Ahmed, Jorge Bernett, Daniel Chelliah, Danny Chen, Shingo Chihara, Stuart H Cohen, Jennifer Cunningham, Antonella D'Arminio Monforte, Saad Ismail, Hideaki Kato, Giuseppe Lapadula, Erwan L'Her, Toshitaka Maeno, Sumit Majumder, Marco Massari, Marta Mora-Rillo, Yoshikazu Mutoh, Duc Nguyen, Ewa Verweij, Alexander Zoufaly, Anu O Osinusi, Adam DeZure, Yang Zhao, Lijie Zhong, Anand Chokkalingam, Emon Elboudwarej, Laura Telep, Leighann Timbs, Ilana Henne, Scott Sellers, Huyen Cao, Susanna K Tan, Lucinda Winterbourne, Polly Desai, Robertino Mera, Anuj Gaggar, Robert P Myers, Diana M Brainard, Richard Childs, Timothy Flanigan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,662 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3367 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 452 13%
Student > Bachelor 398 12%
Other 285 8%
Student > Master 269 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 239 7%
Other 669 20%
Unknown 1055 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 915 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 252 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 237 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 104 3%
Other 544 16%
Unknown 1190 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7970. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#319
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#32
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38
of 403,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#9
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.