RT @ErinSandersNP: 6/ Here are 2 excellent Nature articles on the origins of SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/SAdqWe8KMw @robertson_lab @arambaut…
RT @mellziland: Referência da 11: https://t.co/SlIB9TXA1F E falando em todas as letras: NÃO, O VÍRUS NÃO É CHINÊS, não foi produzido na ch…
@TheNorth_A البته نیچر هم نظرش همینه و تا وقتی نهاد علمی دیگهای در این سطح نظر مخالفی ارائه نکرده بهتره به تئوریهای لابراتواری اهمیت ندیم. https://t.co/j4U8Jh5iOL
@SUNKNIGHT2010 @EanMeyer @hacks4pancakes @IanColdwater Also, just to provide evidence of just how fractally wrong you are, in case anyone else is reading: https://t.co/j38oxknTpE https://t.co/JF7Yn14VWi
RT @florenciatevy: De momento no hay ni siquiera cepas diferentes y los inmunólogos saben que el virus puede mutar y han hecho los antígeno…
De momento no hay ni siquiera cepas diferentes y los inmunólogos saben que el virus puede mutar y han hecho los antígenos de las vacunas p/ke funcionen efectivamente. Ninguna empresa va a gastar millones $$ en vacunas ke no sirven o que nadie quiere usar.
@Snuffle16106950 @totallyawry @theheraldsun These are all anti-China sources. Not what you would call "independent". Compelling viewing but... All tend to "lead the evidence ", rather than let the evidence lead. Here is an "independent" scientific source..
RT @mellziland: Referência da 11: https://t.co/SlIB9TXA1F E falando em todas as letras: NÃO, O VÍRUS NÃO É CHINÊS, não foi produzido na ch…
RT @mellziland: Referência da 11: https://t.co/SlIB9TXA1F E falando em todas as letras: NÃO, O VÍRUS NÃO É CHINÊS, não foi produzido na ch…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
@Detroitmade1919 @DangerBonesA @BNODesk Anderson says "... what can be deduced about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 from comparative analysis of genomic data.”.."Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulate
@VillainousGoo if you think it would change his mind at all - there is a peer-reviewed paper showing it's not of laboratory origin. one important thing to note is that the spike protein binding is actually suboptimal and if it was engineered could be bette
RT @mellziland: Referência da 11: https://t.co/SlIB9TXA1F E falando em todas as letras: NÃO, O VÍRUS NÃO É CHINÊS, não foi produzido na ch…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
RT @mellziland: 13 - Nesse artigo, se comenta que pangolins malaios (Manis javanica) importados ilegalmente para a província de Guangdong c…
RT @mellziland: Referência da 11: https://t.co/SlIB9TXA1F E falando em todas as letras: NÃO, O VÍRUS NÃO É CHINÊS, não foi produzido na ch…
RT @mellziland: 13 - Nesse artigo, se comenta que pangolins malaios (Manis javanica) importados ilegalmente para a província de Guangdong c…
RT @mellziland: Referência da 11: https://t.co/SlIB9TXA1F E falando em todas as letras: NÃO, O VÍRUS NÃO É CHINÊS, não foi produzido na ch…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
13 - Nesse artigo, se comenta que pangolins malaios (Manis javanica) importados ilegalmente para a província de Guangdong contêm coronavírus semelhantes ao SARS-CoV-2, e isso pode ter contribuido pra otimizar a ligação para o nosso ACE2 e tchum, COVID-19
Referência da 11: https://t.co/SlIB9TXA1F E falando em todas as letras: NÃO, O VÍRUS NÃO É CHINÊS, não foi produzido na china, não foi manipulado em laboratório fruto de uma grande conspiração, ele é fruto de interações naturais, e nossa relação com o amb
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
RT @JudyAnd56006226: 利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。ht…
利普金之前3月份为共匪站台的文章在这里,请注意那几位联合属名的作者,第一位就是那位把评论关掉的Kristian。后面几位可能也会出来反对闫博士。战友们不需要太了解内容,就是注意一下这些人,了解他们的立场,这样知己知彼,以免晕头转向。https://t.co/jm6mIGxDKb
@Lord_Sugar Dear Lord Sugar. Despite what CAPS-LOCK nutters on Twitter might say, numerous studies by top virologists have demonstrated that the virus is not man-made, including this one https://t.co/9i9cSQ103q https://t.co/wooiWoasGF
RT @HaraldRingbauer: This excellent work looks into SARS-CoV-2 being an artificial construct and provides strong evidence that it is not. T…
RT @WSarai: É falso que o novo #coronavírus tenha sido manipulado, seja pela China, seja por algum país ou grupo. Isso já foi esclarecido h…
É falso que o novo #coronavírus tenha sido manipulado, seja pela China, seja por algum país ou grupo. Isso já foi esclarecido há semanas, em artigo publicado na respeitada revista #Nature: https://t.co/JQBLDu3tuz
@Indekkusu_L_P https://t.co/XSkIHXnODc nope it's 100% natural.
This article refuting lab engineering of covid, pretty explains virus engineering methods. Why the methods couldn't be reverse engineered without lab. Doesn't say. Seems like1)infect human with mutation2)sneeze on bat.3) make bat sneeze on different human,
@Lamoo90 @RFI_Cn 是不是人造早就有结论了,你水平这么低估计是看不懂 https://t.co/o5hR0PaoWH
@gmnamedlong @veryvirology @grawoig @facbook @UNC @NIH Virologists did not observe evidence of genetic engineering in SARS-CoV-2 "The generation of the predicted O-linked glycans is also unlikely to have occurred due to cell-culture passage, as such featur
@yeningusa 叶大律师,不信中共总该信美国吧,信科学吧,美国国家生物技术中心关于病毒起源的论文麻烦你阅读一下。 https://t.co/v0pH4oLLMl
@BlokeOfWords @ElDragoPollo @LLHallJ @JimMFelton @Lord_Sugar Scientists around the world have examined the virus and, if it had been altered, would be able to tell in its genome data. There’s no evidence. Journalist are you, yeah? Politifact: https://t.c
@Lord_Sugar Mate, you're a little unhinged. Why are you phrasing things like this for no reason? Independent geneticists have shown that it's not a lab construct. https://t.co/DkGac9x0EA https://t.co/XgF69Ye5fU
No Alan, we know. Maybe if you learned some science instead of repeating conspiracy theories? https://t.co/WcNOidJb08
@joeconrad79 @gnomeicide Yes we do https://t.co/WcNOidJb08
@MarshaBlackburn This bogus claim that COVID-19 is a man-made virus intentionally manufactured in a lab and released to the public was disproven back in March in an article NATURE MEDICINE by KG Anderson et. al. (https://t.co/Bqi8xQA0Gw
RT @ErinSandersNP: 6/ Here are 2 excellent Nature articles on the origins of SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/SAdqWe8KMw @robertson_lab @arambaut…
6/ Here are 2 excellent Nature articles on the origins of SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/SAdqWe8KMw @robertson_lab @arambaut @maciekboni https://t.co/FwujgOcX1C @K_G_Andersen
RT @Topo_Ligio: Hello @Nature, is it ethical to publish research against the theories of the virus created in Chinese laboratory when its a…
RT @Topo_Ligio: Hello @Nature, is it ethical to publish research against the theories of the virus created in Chinese laboratory when its a…
@RayZhang33333 Not up for debate, it happened. First documented cases in China. Consensus is natural evolution and transmission from animals (as for Ebola, SARS, HIV, and many flu outbreaks). Not created in a lab. https://t.co/VdE6Kd69sJ https://t.co/YV
@daisyclover9 @MarkPGuy @TuckerCarlson 1)whats your "scientific background" 2) You got any peer reviewed source for this, bc all I see is credible science disproving this 🤔 https://t.co/uH6GonfgbT https://t.co/zTt3kk1MER https://t.co/WOtlzHzdbT
@Harvard2H @NoWackyScience @WorldEdgeDG @chrismartenson @joshrogin @JamieMetzl @BillyBostickson @daniel_bilar @sethabracken Lmao, so you're the author of that study that you promote. Why isn't it published in actual LEADING journals? XD A scientific paper
RT @Topo_Ligio: Hello @Nature, is it ethical to publish research against the theories of the virus created in Chinese laboratory when its a…
RT @bbhugTW: @dongmianxiong1 NCBI美国国家生物技术信息中心收藏的论文说的非常清楚,“病毒不可能来自实验室对其他SARS管状病毒的操作。” It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through labor…
@dongmianxiong1 NCBI美国国家生物技术信息中心收藏的论文说的非常清楚,“病毒不可能来自实验室对其他SARS管状病毒的操作。” It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus. https://t.co/u0BipWKRFt
RT @Topo_Ligio: Hello @Nature, is it ethical to publish research against the theories of the virus created in Chinese laboratory when its a…
@MW08758848 @ABCmediawatch @abcnews @dfat @TheRealPBarry @SharriMarkson https://t.co/SmONeWWJkg One of the co-authors is Ian Lipkin, who went to China in January 2020 to receive the PRC's highest medal of honour, just months before co-authoring this.
RT @Topo_Ligio: @PatriziaRametta Indovinate da chi è finanziato Andersen che vuole prendere Trump a calcio in culo e che firma la "ricerca"…
RT @Topo_Ligio: Andersen lavora allo Scripps Research Institute che ha 20 milioni di perdite l'anno, ma appena compare ufficiosamente il vi…
RT @Topo_Ligio: Andersen lavora allo Scripps Research Institute che ha 20 milioni di perdite l'anno, ma appena compare ufficiosamente il vi…
RT @_mauriciopozo: @kr4zyb0y @tomasturbaci0n @Intrashh @santacruzarg Quisiera una fuente que sea mas neutral y menos propaganda anticomunis…
@Hojo_Rojo @Merennulli The SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) in the spike protein is the most notable difference with other viruses. It’s discussed in this article: https://t.co/11BGstmHJI
RT @Ignis87736341: Si un labo avait créé le virus, on retrouverait des traces d'autres coronavirus combinés dans le génome. Ce qui n'est…
@HCel1ne @1snugbookworm @WernerKandas @doth_the_S @sta_tor @Wortschwert 1. Sars-CoV-2 ist eine Zoonose, die Ende 2020 erstmals auf den Menschen übergegangen ist. https://t.co/cnO9Ipt1Sm
@TwoTales1 Many known scientists have concluded that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus. One example: https://t.co/11BGstmHJI
@Auziman_15 @Ray35071068 @JoeBiden @realDonaldTrump Who confirmed it? Facebook? Steve Bannon's cronies? Do your research and don't spread conspiracy theories like President Dumbass @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/9lO0YNqbRA https://t.co/FSTd9fcNbR https:/
@kr4zyb0y @tomasturbaci0n @Intrashh @santacruzarg Quisiera una fuente que sea mas neutral y menos propaganda anticomunista. Acá se responde que el virus no pudo haber sido creado en laboratorio https://t.co/vDWTi50Tpt https://t.co/Amfd8LsnYD https://t.co/
RT @Ignis87736341: Si un labo avait créé le virus, on retrouverait des traces d'autres coronavirus combinés dans le génome. Ce qui n'est…
RT @Ignis87736341: Si un labo avait créé le virus, on retrouverait des traces d'autres coronavirus combinés dans le génome. Ce qui n'est…
Si un labo avait créé le virus, on retrouverait des traces d'autres coronavirus combinés dans le génome. Ce qui n'est pas le cas. Une étude intéressante sur le sujet : https://t.co/MiowtFnq4O
@certainlyerz Dr. Fauci is using evidence-based medicine to minimize COVID-19 fatalities during a pandemic. Lockdowns are effective. "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." https://t.co
@ThomasHollomon @TuckerCarlson The matter is resolved, not by government but the scientific community https://t.co/IFBEFxVHEc
Hola, Blass. Esperaré un poco, para que veas este tuit con aquello por lo que preguntaste. Luego te bloquearé por zafio. Adiós, Blass. https://t.co/J23hDm9r7E
@TheRealKennySey @GregBaldwinIroh @realDonaldTrump Why is my belief relevant? Scientific analysis/research is determinative The virus has natural zoonotic origins https://t.co/iZllN3NiOf Masks DO work. Wear one. https://t.co/lIXBnbQjWE A “Facebook truth
@SuperSpain67 @maldita_ciencia Sí. Este paper de Nature ya lo desmontó en marzo. https://t.co/wsfji0nVEy
Y no las tiene. Ya en Nature se publicó este estudio en marzo que tira por tierra la conspiranoia de la artificialidad del virus: https://t.co/wsfji0nVEy
RT @Dr_ming_13: 廣為引用的Sars-Cov-2是來源於自然的文章係https://t.co/K4GhGdEqBz 其中的theory其中一個否定是因為沒有病毒模板,而閆麗夢的文章第一個論據就是這個解放軍擁有的舟山病毒是可以做為backbone的 https:/…
RT @Dr_ming_13: 廣為引用的Sars-Cov-2是來源於自然的文章係https://t.co/K4GhGdEqBz 其中的theory其中一個否定是因為沒有病毒模板,而閆麗夢的文章第一個論據就是這個解放軍擁有的舟山病毒是可以做為backbone的 https:/…
@__ice9 What are your thoughts on this Nature paper "...we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" https://t.co/El9ZKfC4gt Non sequiturs galore. All seems to hinge on an opinion that betacoronaviruses would have been used fo
The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/VXHYFyJA0E
RT @Nikolas_Yezhov: @n_santama https://t.co/yakPIkEUeh @katerina_strati
RT @Dr_ming_13: 廣為引用的Sars-Cov-2是來源於自然的文章係https://t.co/K4GhGdEqBz 其中的theory其中一個否定是因為沒有病毒模板,而閆麗夢的文章第一個論據就是這個解放軍擁有的舟山病毒是可以做為backbone的 https:/…
@n_santama https://t.co/yakPIkEUeh @katerina_strati
“Thus, the high-affinity binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of natural selection...” MOST LIKELY!! I would translate her statements. For example, “that means you are saying there is a possibility manufactured”
RT @Dr_ming_13: 廣為引用的Sars-Cov-2是來源於自然的文章係https://t.co/K4GhGdEqBz 其中的theory其中一個否定是因為沒有病毒模板,而閆麗夢的文章第一個論據就是這個解放軍擁有的舟山病毒是可以做為backbone的 https:/…
@lynnli77091240 @aadbfs @tedcruz scientists have already said the virus isn’t from a lab. Months ago. https://t.co/J5dnrUq7WF