@realDon0tB4g0t @DrSuneelDhand However much you want it to be an engineered virus, there's nothing to support it. https://t.co/qDDObVWbfh
RT @alexandrosM: On March 17th, another cornerstone is released: "The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2". While it does declare one potential…
@liz_churchill10 There is no evidence Bill Gates or Barack Obama orchestrated or started the COVID-19 pandemic. The suggestion that COVID-19 is a deliberately planned pandemic is false. https://t.co/musB6tBrJH https://t.co/ZahS6kRUIG
RT @alexandrosM: On March 17th, another cornerstone is released: "The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2". While it does declare one potential…
@CaulfieldTim Which 'easy publication' published an unscientific, collusioned article of misinformation, disinformation, its authors deliberately intended to mislead the scientific and public community and has been petitioned by thousands of scientists to
RT @weldeiry: @Biorealism @WashburneAlex @eLife @thescientistgh @PlantEvolution I still do not know (since April, 2020) how the FCS with un…
@Biorealism @WashburneAlex @eLife @thescientistgh @PlantEvolution I still do not know (since April, 2020) how the FCS with unusual nucleotide use got there.
@SaindodaBolha O cara nem entrou no link pra saber que foram revisados por pares e ja citou USP que só hospedou a matéria kkkk E logo após, ainda cita "confirmação de viés" pra mim sendo que acaba de usar isso agora kkkkkkk Toma aí: https://t.co/oV4Lii5
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @christianperez: 🔴 El genoma del SARS-CoV-2 tiene muchas similitudes con otros coronavirus que existen en la naturaleza y no hay evidenc…
RT @christianperez: “La transmisión exitosa de los virus del linaje A y B después de eventos zoonóticos independientes indica que no fue ne…
🔴 El genoma del SARS-CoV-2 tiene muchas similitudes con otros coronavirus que existen en la naturaleza y no hay evidencias de que haya sido modificado o alterado por el hombre: - https://t.co/QpTk1bZxdp - https://t.co/Xq1VPYC88W - https://t.co/CfJp5Ul2pw
“La transmisión exitosa de los virus del linaje A y B después de eventos zoonóticos independientes indica que no fue necesaria una adaptación evolutiva dentro de los humanos para que el SARS-CoV-2 se propagara”. https://t.co/QpTk1bZxdp
@DrMariaNeira @JeremyFarrar @WHO @TIME @wellcometrust And modest, as well. He organized, managed, and micro-managed a key scientific paper which was instrumental in suppression of debate over the possible research-related origin of SARS-CoV-2. Yet you won’
RT @VBruttel: @UllmannMdB @KonstantinNotz @vonderleyen Es gibt einige hochrangig publizierte Artikel, die einen Laborursprung ausschließen,…
Der proximale Ursprung von SARS-CoV-2 | Naturmedizin https://t.co/PDG2R1Lnry
@UllmannMdB @KonstantinNotz @vonderleyen Es gibt einige hochrangig publizierte Artikel, die einen Laborursprung ausschließen, zB der meist zitierte: https://t.co/NSzF5o0jwb In Wirklichkeit hielten aber selbst genau diese Autoren einen Laborursprung für hoc
RT @danwalker9999: @LawrenceGostin The director of a multi-billion dollar science-funding initiated, managed, and micro-managed a scientifi…
RT @danwalker9999: @LawrenceGostin Image manipulation in a series of peer-reviewed scientific articles. That’s an attack on science.
RT @PoyetPatrice: Pathological science was well studied by Langmuir. Some examples take longer to be evidenced than others. The CO2 fable w…
RT @danwalker9999: @LawrenceGostin Image manipulation in a series of peer-reviewed scientific articles. That’s an attack on science.
@LawrenceGostin The director of a multi-billion dollar science-funding initiated, managed, and micro-managed a scientific paper intended to close off debate on the origin of COVID. But left no public trace of his involvement. That’s an attack on science.
@LawrenceGostin Image manipulation in a series of peer-reviewed scientific articles. That’s an attack on science.
The stupidity is mind boggling
@tristanwaleckx @MagaliReghezza Le "consensus scientifique" est un oxymore, le bon sens populaire commence à le comprendre après que l'on nous ait expliqué, consensus du narratif oblige, dans les meilleures revues scientifiques, que le virus venait du marc
@SoCalBohoGal @ejwwest They've not been "laxed" but rather enrolled to enforce groupthink in favor of a narrative. One good example among so many. Did the virus come from the lab or the wet market? Pathological science. https://t.co/EfRzxxMXQY https://t.c
@ejwwest So their reputation is now in tatters. Do you belong still to those who claimed that the virus originated from the wet market and called us who doubted conspiration bla or none are now left that 15 US agencies falsified the fable? https://t.co/EfR
@Snazzydave1 @latimeralder @JonnyH19852 Science is not made by videos. Pathological science is made by broken processes, corrupted scientists and ridiculous ideas enforced by the dogma & narrative. Some examples (one still to be exposed): https://t.co
@JonnyH19852 @latimeralder @Snazzydave1 Explain the process to us so that we better understand how that sort of pathological science can be published? https://t.co/EfRzxxMXQY https://t.co/G0GvlcZCaP
@latimeralder It has nothing to do with spelling mistakes, it checks that the narrative is enforced. 3 good examples of pathological science, one not yet debunked: https://t.co/gn9T5TKt1c https://t.co/EfRzxxMXQY https://t.co/G0GvlcZCaP
@julie_kelly2 @TallDave7 Come on, how dare you, you know that science told us that COVID originated out of the wet market, don't you? Wait for the next fable to be debunked, the CO2 control knob. Pathological science (Langmuir) https://t.co/gn9T5TKt1c http
Pathological science was well studied by Langmuir. Some examples take longer to be evidenced than others. The CO2 fable will last alas longer than that of the deception about COVID origins. https://t.co/G0GvlcZCaP https://t.co/EfRzxxMXQY https://t.co/gn9T
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
@GreenOlivine @JimSteeleSkepti Not only, they are done in many places in many ways. You'd like to shut up the voices to the pal-reviewed propaganda backed journals, the best of them even telling us now for which US candidate to vote. Their fall will happen
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
@tatiann69922625 @COVIDSelect 17/03/2020 Nature "Medicine The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2", Kristian G. Andersen et al. https://t.co/P8NRYdE02C 11/07/2023 Science "Politicians, scientists spar over alleged NIH cover-up using COVID-19 origin paper" https:
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
@ban_epp_gofroc A 🧵 of Robert Garry retractions and not-quite retractions.
When will Nature magazine retract this bullshit article? https://t.co/35d9aeqYbJ
@spongebob1808 @dweinberger @TheKevinDalton I'm sorry someone convinced you that the virus was man-made, we have studied it and can see that it is not. I can provide you verification, but you're not going to understand much of it. https://t.co/AQjUXpxoJE
@RealMorgellons This was peer reviewed: https://t.co/I60WgGL9bo It well known to be end-to-end bullshit, like just about everything coming out of the fraud-based pseudoscience known as "medicine"... Medicine isn't science, so the notion of "peer review"
@uTobian @JamesSurowiecki @MollyJongFast @maddow SARS-CoV-2 is a natural coronavirus from animal to human spillover. Analysis of the genome found no evidence of genetic engineering or previous viral backbone. https://t.co/HkV5B207lL
RT @christianperez: Durante su intervención negaron las acusaciones de que los funcionarios los incitaron a publicar un comentario en Natur…
@tarsins @toadmeister I hope Nature is also classified in the conspiracy basket after this paper was published and cited more than 6000 time https://t.co/EfRzxxMXQY
Durante su intervención negaron las acusaciones de que los funcionarios los incitaron a publicar un comentario en Nature Medicine en marzo de 2020 concluyendo que el SARS-CoV-2 no mostraba signos de ingeniería genética. https://t.co/d5iIItwBLG
@b12369047 @CN_MFG @Noahpinion @M_Ammar814 Let's debunk all 'your' US State propaganda lies: https://t.co/HwEp0Z9qmL https://t.co/zl1yeO6M8m https://t.co/YgHkCMJuAB https://t.co/5bKrlgjPo6 etc Enjoy the humiliation / schooling
@RandPaul What grotesque US conspiracy theory are you trying to peddle now, over an email from 2020? https://t.co/zl1yeO6M8m
@gdemaneuf I was wrong. There is a tiny bit of daylight between unlikely and improbable. https://t.co/Gzyq1AoCJ5
@Damo__73_ @_BrianMankin_ @cllrLisaScott @SteveGrant67 Of course, fake science never makes its way into a academic journal.. https://t.co/aQjIjs3jOm
@HopeRising19 On 5/17/2020 I had gathered enough info to conclude and decide I was NOT going to put THAT in my body. Nature Medicine: The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/GRwofKuiX1 Lab-Made? SARS-CoV-2 Genealogy Through the Lens of Gain-of-Func
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @maiti_86: たまたま見つけてしまいました。 結局、人工でしたね。 そういえば二回接種で終生免疫とかおっしゃってましたね。 また見事に外しましたね。 https://t.co/fcJkXKSuRD
@ban_epp_gofroc @phorthbeing @reluctantlyjoe If you think it's just one paper, then you have a long way to go. But feel free to follow AGW denialists like Ridley in paranoia about experts' private messages, claiming Congressional investigations will vindi
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
@aterranegra @FmMosca sulla famiglia dei Coronavirus e le tue puttanate crollano, il problema è tuo. Se tu ti fossi fatto un minimo di idea a riguardo sapresti che ci sono casi precedenti e documentari sul pangolino e sul gruppo delle proteine RBD. Ma si,
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @Amy31129057: I thought they said “It’s hard to make a virus. Otherwise, we all would have done it.”😏 https://t.co/XudTiX7uf1
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。
RT @hkakeya: 自分の発言には責任を持ちましょう。