↓ Skip to main content

The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 43,108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
11264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14013 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence
Published in
The Lancet, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha K Brooks, Rebecca K Webster, Louise E Smith, Lisa Woodland, Simon Wessely, Neil Greenberg, Gideon James Rubin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,389 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14,013 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14013 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1945 14%
Student > Master 1760 13%
Researcher 1169 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1018 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 682 5%
Other 2447 17%
Unknown 4992 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2169 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 1920 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1035 7%
Social Sciences 710 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 323 2%
Other 2326 17%
Unknown 5530 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6612. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#468
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#47
of 43,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36
of 385,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#6
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.