↓ Skip to main content

Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
7839 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation
Published in
Science, February 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.abb2507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Wrapp, Nianshuang Wang, Kizzmekia S. Corbett, Jory A. Goldsmith, Ching-Lin Hsieh, Olubukola Abiona, Barney S. Graham, Jason S. McLellan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,939 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 491 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 463 41%
Student > Bachelor 391 35%
Student > Master 327 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 176 16%
Other 568 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 681 61%
Medicine and Dentistry 293 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 225 20%
Chemistry 224 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 199 18%
Other 599 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4002. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,244
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Science
#71
of 83,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76
of 385,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#6
of 906 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 906 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.