@Wood_House76 Yes sorry misread you. Obviously the first CASE was chinese, since we were testing only chinese people. But your source say there is 300 infected people, while in reality there was over 75 815 individuals infected just in the city of Wuhan a
@ChrisAlvino There was never any relevant contact tracing in China. Someone missed the early science. "we estimated that 75 815 individuals have been infected in Wuhan as of Jan 25, 2020." good luck contact tracing that... https://t.co/b5j46rqIls
@janemerrick23 Yeah Vallance had probably read this Lancet article which was first published online on 31st Jan 2020. I've always though of it as the 'cat well and truly out of the bag' paper This is figure 1 - Risk of spread outside Wuhan https://t.co
Here Wu et al. (https://t.co/b5j46rqIls) "75 815 individuals have been infected in Wuhan as of Jan 25, 2020" Here the Feb 19 report (https://t.co/kx6ZVmQp6I) Which quote Fumare who quote Wu et al. Here is Dr. Tedros crying over sad piano music about the la