You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water and Bladder Cancer Burden in the European Union
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1289/ehp4495 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iro Evlampidou, Laia Font-Ribera, David Rojas-Rueda, Esther Gracia-Lavedan, Nathalie Costet, Neil Pearce, Paolo Vineis, Jouni J.K. Jaakkola, Francis Delloye, Konstantinos C. Makris, Euripides G. Stephanou, Sophia Kargaki, Frantisek Kozisek, Torben Sigsgaard, Birgitte Hansen, Jörg Schullehner, Ramon Nahkur, Catherine Galey, Christian Zwiener, Marta Vargha, Elena Righi, Gabriella Aggazzotti, Gunda Kalnina, Regina Grazuleviciene, Kinga Polanska, Dasa Gubkova, Katarina Bitenc, Emma H. Goslan, Manolis Kogevinas, Cristina M. Villanueva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 289 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 94 | 33% |
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 4 | 1% |
| Argentina | 4 | 1% |
| Ireland | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 131 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 246 | 85% |
| Scientists | 24 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 11% |
| Engineering | 19 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 583. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#40,752
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#50
of 8,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#984
of 480,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.