↓ Skip to main content

How weaponizing disinformation can bring down a city’s power grid

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
198 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
11 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How weaponizing disinformation can bring down a city’s power grid
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0236517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gururaghav Raman, Bedoor AlShebli, Marcin Waniek, Talal Rahwan, Jimmy Chih-Hsien Peng

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 198 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 25 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 18%
Computer Science 10 15%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#224,023
of 26,733,946 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,252
of 233,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,781
of 430,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#73
of 2,747 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,733,946 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,747 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.