You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How weaponizing disinformation can bring down a city’s power grid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0236517 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gururaghav Raman, Bedoor AlShebli, Marcin Waniek, Talal Rahwan, Jimmy Chih-Hsien Peng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 7 | 3% |
| Germany | 6 | 3% |
| Sweden | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 89 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 180 | 89% |
| Scientists | 16 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#207,321
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,065
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,497
of 428,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#70
of 2,753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.