↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
98 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3195 tweeters
facebook
15 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Blogs Policy documents Twitter Facebook Wikipedia Research highlights Dimensions citations
Title
Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
The Lancet, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30298-3
Pubmed ID
31255301
Authors

Mélanie Drolet, Élodie Bénard, Norma Pérez, Marc Brisson, Hammad Ali, Marie-Claude Boily, Vincenzo Baldo, Paul Brassard, Julia M L Brotherton, Denton Callander, Marta Checchi, Eric P F Chow, Silvia Cocchio, Tina Dalianis, Shelley L Deeks, Christian Dehlendorff, Basil Donovan, Christopher K Fairley, Elaine W Flagg, Julia W Gargano, Suzanne M Garland, Nathalie Grün, Bo T Hansen, Christopher Harrison, Eva Herweijer, Teresa M Imburgia, Anne M Johnson, Jessica A Kahn, Kimberley Kavanagh, Susanne K Kjaer, Erich V Kliewer, Bette Liu, Dorothy A Machalek, Lauri Markowitz, David Mesher, Christian Munk, Linda Niccolai, Mari Nygård, Gina Ogilvie, Jeannie Oliphant, Kevin G Pollock, Maria Jesús Purriños-Hermida, Megan A Smith, Marc Steben, Anna Söderlund-Strand, Pam Sonnenberg, Pär Sparen, Clare Tanton, Cosette M Wheeler, Petra J Woestenberg, Bo Nancy Yu

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,195 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Other 19 8%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 54 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 71 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2366. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,185
of 15,930,981 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#75
of 35,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 266,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#3
of 452 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,930,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.