| Title |
Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30298-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mélanie Drolet, Élodie Bénard, Norma Pérez, Marc Brisson, Hammad Ali, Marie-Claude Boily, Vincenzo Baldo, Paul Brassard, Julia M L Brotherton, Denton Callander, Marta Checchi, Eric P F Chow, Silvia Cocchio, Tina Dalianis, Shelley L Deeks, Christian Dehlendorff, Basil Donovan, Christopher K Fairley, Elaine W Flagg, Julia W Gargano, Suzanne M Garland, Nathalie Grün, Bo T Hansen, Christopher Harrison, Eva Herweijer, Teresa M Imburgia, Anne M Johnson, Jessica A Kahn, Kimberley Kavanagh, Susanne K Kjaer, Erich V Kliewer, Bette Liu, Dorothy A Machalek, Lauri Markowitz, David Mesher, Christian Munk, Linda Niccolai, Mari Nygård, Gina Ogilvie, Jeannie Oliphant, Kevin G Pollock, Maria Jesús Purriños-Hermida, Megan A Smith, Marc Steben, Anna Söderlund-Strand, Pam Sonnenberg, Pär Sparen, Clare Tanton, Cosette M Wheeler, Petra J Woestenberg, Bo Nancy Yu |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,966 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 385 | 13% |
| United States | 232 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 137 | 5% |
| Spain | 120 | 4% |
| Ireland | 76 | 3% |
| Mexico | 69 | 2% |
| Argentina | 47 | 2% |
| France | 36 | 1% |
| Colombia | 32 | 1% |
| Other | 410 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1422 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2420 | 82% |
| Scientists | 274 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 233 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 37 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 616 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 85 | 14% |
| Researcher | 69 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 94 | 15% |
| Unknown | 225 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 86 | 14% |
| Unknown | 261 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,288
of 24,546,092 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#160
of 41,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48
of 351,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,546,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.