Report for: Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Title	Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in	The Lancet, August 2019
DOI	10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30298-3
Pubmed ID	31255301
Authors	Mélanie Drolet, Élodie Bénard, Norma Pérez, Marc Brisson, Hammad Ali, Marie-Claude Boily, Vincenzo Baldo, Paul Brassard, Julia M L Brotherton, Denton Callander, Marta Checchi, Eric P F Chow, Silvia Cocchio, Tina Dalianis, Shelley L Deeks, Christian Dehlendorff, Basil Donovan, Christopher K Fairley, Elaine W Flagg, Julia W Gargano, Suzanne M Garland, Nathalie Grün, Bo T Hansen, Christopher Harrison, Eva Herweijer, Teresa M Imburgia, Anne M Johnson, Jessica A Kahn, Kimberley Kavanagh, Susanne K Kjaer, Erich V Kliewer, Bette Liu, Dorothy A Machalek, Lauri Markowitz, David Mesher, Christian Munk, Linda Niccolai, Mari Nygård, Gina Ogilvie, Jeannie Oliphant, Kevin G Pollock, Maria Jesús Purriños-Hermida, Megan A Smith, Marc Steben, Anna Söderlund-Strand, Pam Sonnenberg, Pär Sparen, Clare Tanton, Cosette M Wheeler, Petra J Woestenberg, Bo Nancy Yu

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,298 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Japan	452	14%
United States	255	8%
United Kingdom	152	5%
Spain	124	4%
Ireland	98	3%
Mexico	80	2%
Argentina	51	2%
France	39	1%
Canada	34	1%
Other	438	13%
Unknown	1575	48%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	2721	83%
Scientists	285	9%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	249	8%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	42	1%
Unknown	1	<1%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Unknown	142	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	29	20%
Researcher	18	13%
Other	15	11%
Student > Ph. D. Student	14	10%
Unspecified	10	7%
Other	36	25%
Unknown	20	14%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	51	36%
Unspecified	13	9%
Nursing and Health Professions	11	8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	7	5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	6	4%
Other	24	17%
Unknown	30	21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2409. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.

All research outputs

#566

of 14,195,130 outputs

Outputs from The Lancet

#34

of 32,817 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#27

of 256,466 outputs

Outputs of similar age from The Lancet

of 452 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 14,195,130 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 32,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context