Report for: Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Title	Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in	The Lancet, August 2019
DOI	10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30298-3
Pubmed ID	31255301
Authors	Mélanie Drolet, Élodie Bénard, Norma Pérez, Marc Brisson, Hammad Ali, Marie-Claude Boily, Vincenzo Baldo, Paul Brassard, Julia M L Brotherton, Denton Callander, Marta Checchi, Eric P F Chow, Silvia Cocchio, Tina Dalianis, Shelley L Deeks, Christian Dehlendorff, Basil Donovan, Christopher K Fairley, Elaine W Flagg, Julia W Gargano, Suzanne M Garland, Nathalie Grün, Bo T Hansen, Christopher Harrison, Eva Herweijer, Teresa M Imburgia, Anne M Johnson, Jessica A Kahn, Kimberley Kavanagh, Susanne K Kjaer, Erich V Kliewer, Bette Liu, Dorothy A Machalek, Lauri Markowitz, David Mesher, Christian Munk, Linda Niccolai, Mari Nygård, Gina Ogilvie, Jeannie Oliphant, Kevin G Pollock, Maria Jesús Purriños-Hermida, Megan A Smith, Marc Steben, Anna Söderlund-Strand, Pam Sonnenberg, Pär Sparen, Clare Tanton, Cosette M Wheeler, Petra J Woestenberg, Bo Nancy Yu

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,211 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Japan	433	13%
United States	250	8%
United Kingdom	151	5%
Spain	123	4%
Ireland	98	3%
Mexico	78	2%
Argentina	52	2%
France	41	1%
Colombia	33	1%
Other	450	14%
Unknown	1502	47%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	2619	82%
Scientists	290	9%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	259	8%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	42	1%
Unknown	1	<1%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Unknown	210	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	40	19%
Researcher	27	13%
Student > Bachelor	21	10%
Student > Ph. D. Student	21	10%
Other	17	8%
Other	35	17%
Unknown	49	23%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	70	33%
Nursing and Health Professions	15	7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	9	4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	9	4%
Immunology and Microbiology	8	4%
Other	34	16%
Unknown	65	31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2366. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.

All research outputs

#996

of 15,413,080 outputs

Outputs from The Lancet

#63

of 34,689 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#31

of 263,304 outputs

Outputs of similar age from The Lancet

of 453 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 15,413,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 34,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context