Report for: Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Title	Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in	The Lancet, August 2019
DOI	10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30298-3
Pubmed ID	31255301
Authors	Mélanie Drolet, Élodie Bénard, Norma Pérez, Marc Brisson, Hammad Ali, Marie-Claude Boily, Vincenzo Baldo, Paul Brassard, Julia M L Brotherton, Denton Callander, Marta Checchi, Eric P F Chow, Silvia Cocchio, Tina Dalianis, Shelley L Deeks, Christian Dehlendorff, Basil Donovan, Christopher K Fairley, Elaine W Flagg, Julia W Gargano, Suzanne M Garland, Nathalie Grün, Bo T Hansen, Christopher Harrison, Eva Herweijer, Teresa M Imburgia, Anne M Johnson, Jessica A Kahn, Kimberley Kavanagh, Susanne K Kjaer, Erich V Kliewer, Bette Liu, Dorothy A Machalek, Lauri Markowitz, David Mesher, Christian Munk, Linda Niccolai, Mari Nygård, Gina Ogilvie, Jeannie Oliphant, Kevin G Pollock, Maria Jesús Purriños-Hermida, Megan A Smith, Marc Steben, Anna Söderlund-Strand, Pam Sonnenberg, Pär Sparen, Clare Tanton, Cosette M Wheeler, Petra J Woestenberg, Bo Nancy Yu

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,275 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Japan	450	14%
United States	259	8%
United Kingdom	150	5%
Spain	126	4%
Ireland	96	3%
Mexico	77	2%
Argentina	52	2%
France	41	1%
Canada	34	1%
Other	444	14%
Unknown	1546	47%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	2687	82%
Scientists	283	9%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	262	8%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	42	1%
Unknown	1	<1%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Unknown	171	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	37	22%
Researcher	20	12%
Student > Ph. D. Student	16	9%
Other	15	9%
Student > Bachelor	10	6%
Other	33	19%
Unknown	40	23%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	58	34%
Nursing and Health Professions	15	9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	8	5%
Immunology and Microbiology	5	3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	5	3%
Other	26	15%
Unknown	54	32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2421. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.

All research outputs

#706

of 14,592,815 outputs

Outputs from The Lancet

#46

of 33,519 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#26

of 258,738 outputs

Outputs of similar age from The Lancet

of 452 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 14,592,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 33,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context