You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women’s decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0214057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María José Pérez-Lacasta, Montserrat Martínez-Alonso, Montse Garcia, Maria Sala, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Carmen Vidal, Núria Codern-Bové, Maria Feijoo-Cid, Ana Toledo-Chávarri, Àngels Cardona, Anna Pons, Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila, Montserrat Rue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 53% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 56 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#811,868
of 25,235,161 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,806
of 218,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,651
of 358,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#184
of 2,957 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,957 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.