↓ Skip to main content

The presence of extra chromosomes leads to genomic instability

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The presence of extra chromosomes leads to genomic instability
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms10754
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verena Passerini, Efrat Ozeri-Galai, Mirjam S. de Pagter, Neysan Donnelly, Sarah Schmalbrock, Wigard P. Kloosterman, Batsheva Kerem, Zuzana Storchová

Abstract

Aneuploidy is a hallmark of cancer and underlies genetic disorders characterized by severe developmental defects, yet the molecular mechanisms explaining its effects on cellular physiology remain elusive. Here we show, using a series of human cells with defined aneuploid karyotypes, that gain of a single chromosome increases genomic instability. Next-generation sequencing and SNP-array analysis reveal accumulation of chromosomal rearrangements in aneuploids, with break point junction patterns suggestive of replication defects. Trisomic and tetrasomic cells also show increased DNA damage and sensitivity to replication stress. Strikingly, we find that aneuploidy-induced genomic instability can be explained by the reduced expression of the replicative helicase MCM2-7. Accordingly, restoring near-wild-type levels of chromatin-bound MCM helicase partly rescues the genomic instability phenotypes. Thus, gain of chromosomes triggers replication stress, thereby promoting genomic instability and possibly contributing to tumorigenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 320 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 26%
Researcher 59 18%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 57 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 133 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 9%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 66 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#939,230
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#15,049
of 47,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,405
of 403,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#282
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.