↓ Skip to main content

Typical physics Ph.D. admissions criteria limit access to underrepresented groups but fail to predict doctoral completion

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
730 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Typical physics Ph.D. admissions criteria limit access to underrepresented groups but fail to predict doctoral completion
Published in
Science Advances, January 2019
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aat7550
Pubmed ID
Authors

Casey W. Miller, Benjamin M. Zwickl, Julie R. Posselt, Rachel T. Silvestrini, Theodore Hodapp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 730 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 35%
Researcher 18 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 28 23%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Materials Science 6 5%
Other 36 30%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 744. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#27,175
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#386
of 12,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#508
of 449,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#13
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.