You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ecolottery: Simulating and assessing community assembly with environmental filtering and neutral dynamics inR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12918 |
| Authors |
François Munoz, Matthias Grenié, Pierre Denelle, Adrien Taudière, Fabien Laroche, Caroline Tucker, Cyrille Violle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| France | 2 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Austria | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 46 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,109,394
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,782
of 2,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,271
of 440,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#56
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.