You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hematopoietic stem cell involvement in BCR-ABL1–positive ALL as a potential mechanism of resistance to blinatumomab therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2017-05-782888 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inga Nagel, Marius Bartels, Johannes Duell, Hans-Heinrich Oberg, Sandra Ussat, Henrike Bruckmueller, Oliver Ottmann, Heike Pfeifer, Heiko Trautmann, Nicola Gökbuget, Almuth Caliebe, Dieter Kabelitz, Michael Kneba, Heinz-August Horst, Dieter Hoelzer, Max S Topp, Ingolf Cascorbi, Reiner Siebert, Monika Brüggemann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 38% |
| India | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,918,980
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#1,858
of 33,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,213
of 328,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#54
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.