↓ Skip to main content

Plausible Compositions of the Seven TRAPPIST-1 Planets Using Long-term Dynamical Simulations

Overview of attention for article published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plausible Compositions of the Seven TRAPPIST-1 Planets Using Long-term Dynamical Simulations
Published in
The Astrophysical Journal Letters, June 2017
DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/aa74bf
Authors

B. Quarles, E. V. Quintana, E. Lopez, J. E. Schlieder, T. Barclay

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 41%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 28 68%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#274,363
of 17,609,679 outputs
Outputs from The Astrophysical Journal Letters
#535
of 4,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,077
of 278,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Astrophysical Journal Letters
#19
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,609,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.