↓ Skip to main content

EGFR Phosphorylates Tumor-Derived EGFRvIII Driving STAT3/5 and Progression in Glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EGFR Phosphorylates Tumor-Derived EGFRvIII Driving STAT3/5 and Progression in Glioblastoma
Published in
Cancer Cell, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.09.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qi-Wen Fan, Christine K. Cheng, W. Clay Gustafson, Elizabeth Charron, Petra Zipper, Robyn A. Wong, Justin Chen, Jasmine Lau, Christiane Knobbe-Thomsen, Michael Weller, Natalia Jura, Guido Reifenberger, Kevan M. Shokat, William A. Weiss

Abstract

EGFRvIII, a frequently occurring mutation in primary glioblastoma, results in a protein product that cannot bind ligand, but signals constitutively. Deducing how EGFRvIII causes transformation has been difficult because of autocrine and paracrine loops triggered by EGFRvIII alone or in heterodimers with wild-type EGFR. Here, we document coexpression of EGFR and EGFRvIII in primary human glioblastoma that drives transformation and tumorigenesis in a cell-intrinsic manner. We demonstrate enhancement of downstream STAT signaling triggered by EGFR-catalyzed phosphorylation of EGFRvIII, implicating EGFRvIII as a substrate for EGFR. Subsequent phosphorylation of STAT3 requires nuclear entry of EGFRvIII and formation of an EGFRvIII-STAT3 nuclear complex. Our findings clarify specific oncogenic signaling relationships between EGFR and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 24%
Researcher 53 22%
Student > Master 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 17 7%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 17%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 48 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,267,432
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#1,404
of 3,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,254
of 219,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#16
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.