↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative limitations to photosynthesis in K deficient sunflower and their implications on water-use efficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Physiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative limitations to photosynthesis in K deficient sunflower and their implications on water-use efficiency
Published in
Journal of Plant Physiology, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.11.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bálint Jákli, Ershad Tavakol, Merle Tränkner, Mehmet Senbayram, Klaus Dittert

Abstract

Potassium (K) is crucial for crop growth and is strongly related to stress tolerance and water-use efficiency (WUE). A major physiological effect of K deficiency is the inhibition of net CO2 assimilation (AN) during photosynthesis. Whether this reduction originates from limitations either to photochemical energy conversion or biochemical CO2 fixation or from a limitation to CO2 diffusion through stomata and the leaf mesophyll is debated. In this study, limitations to photosynthetic carbon gain of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under K deficiency and PEG- induced water deficit were quantified and their implications on plant- and leaf-scale WUE (WUEP, WUEL) were evaluated. Results show that neither maximum quantum use efficiency (Fv/Fm) nor in-vivo RubisCo activity were directly affected by K deficiency and that the observed impairment of AN was primarily due to decreased CO2 mesophyll conductance (gm). K deficiency additionally impaired leaf area development which, together with reduced AN, resulted in inhibition of plant growth and a reduction of WUEP. Contrastingly, WUEL was not affected by K supply which indicated no inhibition of stomatal control. PEG-stress further impeded AN by stomatal closure and resulted in enhanced WUEL and high oxidative stress. It can be concluded from this study that reduction of gm is a major response of leaves to K deficiency, possibly due to changes in leaf anatomy, which negatively affects AN and contributes to the typical symptoms like oxidative stress, growth inhibition and reduced WUEP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Physiology
#1,286
of 1,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,785
of 416,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Physiology
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,896 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.