You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Camelid and shark single domain antibodies: structural features and therapeutic potential
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Opinion in Structural Biology, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Doreen Könning, Stefan Zielonka, Julius Grzeschik, Martin Empting, Bernhard Valldorf, Simon Krah, Christian Schröter, Carolin Sellmann, Björn Hock, Harald Kolmar |
| Abstract |
In addition to canonical antibodies composed of heavy and light chains, the adaptive immune systems of camelids and cartilaginous fish comprise heavy-chain only isotypes (HcAb) devoid of light chains, where antigen-binding is mediated exclusively by one variable domain. Due to their inherent favorable attributes, such as high affinity and specificity for their cognate antigen, extraordinary stability, small size and, most importantly, the possibility to complement classical antibodies in terms of 'drugable' target-space, HcAb-derived entities evolved as promising candidates for biomedical applications of which many have already proven to be successful in early stage clinical trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Romania | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 16% |
| Researcher | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 72 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 74 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 80 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,343,061
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Structural Biology
#267
of 2,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,986
of 288,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Structural Biology
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.