You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of acupuncture on rates of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.39471.430451.be |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Manheimer, Grant Zhang, Laurence Udoff, Aviad Haramati, Patricia Langenberg, Brian M Berman, Lex M Bouter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 31% |
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#486,669
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#5,672
of 64,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,147
of 172,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#15
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.