You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Children drinking private well water have higher blood lead than those with city water
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2002729117 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson, Michael Fisher, Allison Clonch, John M. MacDonald, Philip J. Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 28% |
Canada | 3 | 10% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 7% |
Kenya | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
Scientists | 5 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Professor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 41 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 17 | 16% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 45 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#478,901
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8,385
of 103,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,736
of 432,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#244
of 1,106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.