* * * More data on why re-purposed a/o OTC drugs were not recommended for CV19. A horrendous, unprecedented chapter in American medicine. And medical malfeasance. "Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ?"
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
👀
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
Ah, yes. "Cell Research," but Remdesivir seriously hurts and kills. You are wrong about it "effectively inhibiting recent emerge[nt] novel coronavirus." Got it, @cell_res? @RealGeorgeWebb1 @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @doddtra Click on this link👇 h
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @jcf527: We Paid 10,000 times the Price for Vaccines thanks to Dr. Malone. Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir an…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
@drcole12 @PierreKory @DrJudyAMikovits @SenRonJohnson Why didn't Dr Malone speak up sooner?
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
@RepThomasMassie @RandPaul @RepMTG
We Paid 10,000 times the Price for Vaccines thanks to Dr. Malone. Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? https://t.co/rM2MZNNY25 George Webb https://t.co/vT5WvbqHye https://t
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
RT @RealGeorgeWebb1: Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? h…
Malone also had access to a completed study on Remdesivir and HCQ on Feb 4th, 2020. Why no DOMANE evaluation of HCQ? https://t.co/M62FMdtBgX https://t.co/3dXtEnzejB
@JoJoFromJerz HTTPS:// https://t.co/LYQt1KSTMp The world knows the truth. https://t.co/yptRqSeTYp https://t.co/hREGHEcgCv https://t.co/vIDnytXrl6
RT @Bo6_Marley: Well well well. Xiao Gengfu PhD Virologist Party Committee Secretary in Wuhan. Published 2/4/2020 "Remdesivir and chloroqu…
@ITGuy1959 @MdBreathe We're you aware of this? https://t.co/WBFLriAitO
Well well well. Xiao Gengfu PhD Virologist Party Committee Secretary in Wuhan. Published 2/4/2020 "Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus" https://t.co/ohzerj2H15
Chinese paper being used to claim that Remdesivir works against viruses is shown to be a fraud. Not even a real study, it's merely a letter to an editor, with missing data, zero evidence of isolate, & it even states that Chloroquine is very effective.
RT @gr8ful4God2: @RealGeorgeWebb1 Here's another suspect thing: This is the study, from March 30, 2020, used (& even cited by Wiki) to just…
@RealGeorgeWebb1 Here's another suspect thing: This is the study, from March 30, 2020, used (& even cited by Wiki) to justify use of Remdesivir w/C19. However, if you read the study, chloroquine clearly outperforms Remdesivir in EVERY way, including NO
@cms55 @Storm4Congress And they studied another drug at the beginning of the pandemic…at the same time. Ding ding ding https://t.co/zwhLocepfw
@LevantineTimes @Baric_Lab @frank_zelenko @TheLancet No I am talking about this study done using cells. Block replication w/o Zn! Agreed the RCTs on HCQ & IVM were poorly designed; not mass conspiracy. Just incompetence. https://t.co/xlYdL4xI6a
@LevantineTimes @Baric_Lab @frank_zelenko @TheLancet Go back and look at this study and tell me why it blocked replication in vitro and didn’t contain Zn in the media! Max amount clinically was 500mg if exceed that incompetence (see reference 11) https
@LevantineTimes @Baric_Lab @frank_zelenko @TheLancet Yes, poorly designed study. But we knew R & HCQ potential inhibitors in vitro. Safety profiles of both drugs for other uses known. Start there & then do the animal studies. Worked R at Duke for H
@ScottAdamsSays We trust all kinds of sources these days. https://t.co/zwhLocepfw
@FactsMatterRB Here are my receipts showing they punished accounts for sharing covid information that wasn't from China-dominated global authority, World Health Organization. I also shared the wet study graph comparing chloroquine & Remdesivir efficac
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @Hotel2a: for the fact checkers and enraged sheeple: https://t.co/kImg1Yb0Kd
Even #who advised against #remdesivir
RT @gr8ful4God2: 🚨 It was known that Chloroquine was MORE EFFECTIVE against PREVENTION & TREATMENT of COVID-19 and NOT CYTOTOXIC versus Rem…
RT @Hotel2a: for the fact checkers and enraged sheeple: https://t.co/kImg1Yb0Kd
RT @gr8ful4God2: 🚨 It was known that Chloroquine was MORE EFFECTIVE against PREVENTION & TREATMENT of COVID-19 and NOT CYTOTOXIC versus Rem…
RT @gr8ful4God2: 🚨 It was known that Chloroquine was MORE EFFECTIVE against PREVENTION & TREATMENT of COVID-19 and NOT CYTOTOXIC versus Rem…
RT @gr8ful4God2: 🚨 It was known that Chloroquine was MORE EFFECTIVE against PREVENTION & TREATMENT of COVID-19 and NOT CYTOTOXIC versus Rem…
RT @gr8ful4God2: 🚨 It was known that Chloroquine was MORE EFFECTIVE against PREVENTION & TREATMENT of COVID-19 and NOT CYTOTOXIC versus Rem…
@Storm4Congress @RealJamesWoods It was KNOWN in FEB 2020 that Chloroquine both PREVENTED and TREATED C-19, and was the MOST EFFECTIVE at those functions. 😔 https://t.co/fKIRueeQvF
🚨 It was known that Chloroquine was MORE EFFECTIVE against PREVENTION & TREATMENT of COVID-19 and NOT CYTOTOXIC versus Remdesivir IN FEB 2020! 😱 👀👇 https://t.co/jGHBY6AJqZ https://t.co/QSecVB28yL
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
@cialdella01 @LockedFab @chezpasdur @FlorianLemaitr5 @NRanfe Lettre à l'éditeur, avec des données in vitro non publiées https://t.co/beHcUDt7kD
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @_RadioReceiver: whoa
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
RT @HousatonicLive: And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc..…
whoa
And which Chinese scientist (double agent)... on Feb 4 2020 ... baited the USA (Fauci, Bavari, Feldmann, Bright, etc...) into believing China was also sincerely going to kill their own citizens in a DIY pandemic, using Remdesivir ? Zheng-li Shi https:
@aoihana1213 コロナ武漢株拡大初期には作用機序からヒドロキシクロロキンとレムデシビルが最有力の既存、開発中薬でアビガンはin vitroでウイルスを減少させるが標準使用量をはるかに超えた濃度でないと効果が無いと言われていました。 https://t.co/gjPZ1LMbzn
RT @Muller_Lab: @sciencecohen @zhihuachen Also, totally not suspicious that the WIV had a SarsCov2 NP reactive rabbit serum by mid January…
RT @Muller_Lab: @sciencecohen @zhihuachen Also, totally not suspicious that the WIV had a SarsCov2 NP reactive rabbit serum by mid January…
@sciencecohen @zhihuachen Also, totally not suspicious that the WIV had a SarsCov2 NP reactive rabbit serum by mid January (Figure 1) https://t.co/XnDO4h9PAF
@PvanHouwelingen Deze is van het team van Shi Zengli, de zogenaamde Batwoman. Remdesivir en chloroquine remmen het virus onder laboratoriumomstandigheden. Onderzoek werd van bovenaf stopgezet. https://t.co/u7LjLtqehn
@Leeeeenda3 @EileenLeftPA @RandPaul This was published Fed 2020. https://t.co/MkZVWijnFU You could have invested just like he did. Now do Pelosi or stfu
RT @Muller_Lab: @Ayjchan @jbloom_lab One the bright side - the WIV already had SarsCoV2 NP cross-reactive sera in early January (it takes a…
@Ayjchan @jbloom_lab One the bright side - the WIV already had SarsCoV2 NP cross-reactive sera in early January (it takes at minimum, two if not 4 weeks to make such serum, the Wuhan researchers never explained the provenance of this reagent). Source: htt
@boulware_dr @scrippsresearch @NatureComms This was already discussed at the very outset of the epidemic - check the date here. Can't believe someone is still studying this when we know it doesn't work clinically. https://t.co/bA2aqUl7TK
@JMePromeneIci @DocLucas4 @XxSamitchxx @Laurentpiot1 @ptit_nico @Oracledor @Inserm La même efficacité in vitro pour les deux médocs. https://t.co/IGzjqswit8
@Vivelevent13 @Mijto38 @cavousf5 Super, une étude in vitro. C'est bien, mais ca ne marche pas in vivo. Pour rappel le remdesivir, in vitro, montrait également des résultats intéressants. https://t.co/lC07cq2PrZ
RT @babs_zone: @GidMK Totally get what you’re going for here, but I don’t think the first inklings of hydroxychloroquine’s usage were neces…
RT @babs_zone: @GidMK Totally get what you’re going for here, but I don’t think the first inklings of hydroxychloroquine’s usage were neces…
@GidMK Totally get what you’re going for here, but I don’t think the first inklings of hydroxychloroquine’s usage were necessarily fraudulent. This letter appeared in Nature ~a month before Raoult came onto the scene: https://t.co/wgNZvtSuR4
@ReutersFacts "Our findings reveal that remdesivir and chloroquine are highly effective in the control of 2019-nCoV infection in vitro. Since these compounds have been used in human patients with a safety track record" in vitro was good enough here. https:
NIHが「何か調べたフリ」だけやって、その2日後にはFDAがEUAの承認を出してただろ?ww >https://t.co/K46eUFnhDZ この杜撰な審査体制には、何故か一言も言及がなく、文句も言わないバイデン民主党勢とpolitico紙ww が、HCQについては、FDAの恥辱だ汚点だ、と大騒ぎww 提灯記事が酷過ぎるw
@JordanSchachtel @Ben_25413 !?Reminder: Ralph Baric has extensively done experimental research with Remdesivir on coronaviruses before 2020 In the 2017 article Remdesivir is labeled as GS-5734. https://t.co/LdlNhEZFhV https://t.co/KIS23c2s3X