You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Core-like groups result in invalidation of identifying super-spreader by k-shell decomposition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep09602 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying Liu, Ming Tang, Tao Zhou, Younghae Do |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Philippines | 1 | 20% |
| Comoros | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 23 | 30% |
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,027,062
of 23,891,012 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#63,667
of 128,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,438
of 266,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#661
of 1,385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,891,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.