↓ Skip to main content

Asymmetric Counteranion-Directed Catalysis: Concept, Definition, and Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
654 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Asymmetric Counteranion-Directed Catalysis: Concept, Definition, and Applications
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/anie.201205343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Mahlau, Benjamin List

Abstract

Recently, the use of enantiomerically pure counteranions for the induction of asymmetry in reactions proceeding through cationic intermediates has emerged as an exciting new concept, which has been termed asymmetric counteranion-directed catalysis (ACDC). Despite its success, the concept has not been fully defined and systematically discussed to date. This Review closes this gap by providing a clear definition of ACDC and by examining both clear cases as well as more ambiguous examples to illustrate the differences and overlaps with other catalysis concepts.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
India 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 325 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 33%
Researcher 53 16%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 25 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 297 88%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 31 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#948,963
of 19,898,358 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#1,531
of 40,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,356
of 278,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#15
of 639 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,898,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 639 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.